|
|||||
SDS-Website |
|||||
Is Islam a religion? Iconoclast
says no.
Islam has a very large, even dominant, political component and in fact
requires territorial sovereignty - as no other religion does. It is
self-segregating, fosters ideas of Muslim supremacy and thereby sows
seeds of social discord. Even its tradition of charitable giving is
solely for the benefit of fellow Muslims. Islam is the duck-billed
platypus of belief systems - a religio-socio-political ideology. It
covers every aspect of life - personal, social, political and
geo-political. The word religion, is not adequate.
And it is certain that the US Founding Fathers, when they wrote about
"religion," were speaking of religion in the Judeo-Christian context.
They did not mean to protect a religion that would do damage to their
infant republic. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously to uphold the
banning of polygamy in 1878 and as Norman Berdichevsky has
pointed out
(see below),
religious freedom is not, and has never been, an absolute in this
country.
Norman Berdichevsky:
The American Constitution does NOT ABSOLUTELY guarantee Freedom of
Religion and both Federal and State Law have taken action against the
practices (not the beliefs) and consequences of dangerous and immoral
behavior. This was the issue that forced the confrontation of the
government against Brigham Young and the elders of the Church of the
Latter day Saints (Mormons) to alter their “religion” and accept that
American law and citizenship were not congruent with plural marriage or
the exploitation of young teenage girls. The Utah territory would not
have entered the Union without this confrontation when state power
forced a “religion” to change its practices.
The same has been true in many Appalachian states, especially Tennessee,
Kentucky, Georgia, Arkansas, West Virginia and North Carolina where
state authorities forbade the practice of the so called serpent churches
among several Pentecostal denominations after the deaths of numerous
individuals handing venomous snakes. The states forced churches and
church members to accept that the state had a priority to protect
individuals from reckless behavior and protect human life in spite of
the claims of “religious freedom.”
|